Breaking Mathematics

There are several dimensions in math--the 0th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. dimensions. The most interesting one is the 0th dimension which is commonly referred to as a single point in space. A point has no dimension which means there is no measure. If you want to find the distance between two points, you will take the final point minus the initial point. For example, let's say that you want to find the distance between 6 and 2. All you have to do is this simple subtraction: 6-2 = 4. Now instead of finding the distance between two points, we want to find the distance of a single point. For example, we want to find the distance between 9 and 9. So all we have to do is 9-9 = 0. This is good that the definition of a point holds up to this example, but how does it hold up to the number line?

Between two points on a number line, there exists another point between the points. And this can go on towards infinity. So by definition there is an infinite amount of points that make up the number line. But we just proved that a point has no measure? So how does adding up infinite amount points make a measure? It's like adding zero an innumerable amount of times and miraculously appears a unit of measure.

The number line has a unique property. There is no way to determine what the next point is. For example, let's take the number four. The next number can be 4.01, but, actually, there is a number before 4.01 and that's 4.001. So in general, after each integer there is a number that has an infinite amount of zeros with the last number being 1 (i.e. 4.000000000...1). Therefore, between two points there is an infinite amount of points between those two points. Removing a single point from the number line will not affect any measure because there is no length removed, and there are an infinite amount of points that can take the missing point's place.

So drawing a point is impossible. By simply a dabbing a paper--ever so slightly--is still an exaggeration of what a point is. Also drawing graphs are impossible because they are composed of points.

This idea is part of number theory, and this topic almost broke math. Mathematicians ignored this idea and proceeded on doing math. This is a problem because all of mathematics is based on numbers and what they truly are. If this problem was not solved, all theorems, equations, and numbers, will be false. This naive notion of simply accepting the fact that numbers are numbers is horrible way to construct math.

Thanks for those who read my blogs. I want to shamelessly plug my YouTube channel that I recently created. It's just like this blog but in a video format. Here's the link: The Integration Youtube Channel. Hope you guys continue liking my blogs! Enjoy exploring math and science!

Infinite Sums are Weird

What if I told you that 1-1+1-1+1-1+... = 1/2, and I proved it?

So lets take an infinite series, S.

S = 1-1+1-1+1-1+1-1+...

Now lets factor out a negative one from the second term to infinity...

S = 1-(1-1+1-1+1-1+...)

The grouped values are identical to the original series, S. 

S = 1-S

Now with some help from algebra, we can solve for S.

S = 1-S

2S = 1

S = 1/2

Therefore,

1-1+1-1+1-1+... = 1/2

Who knew? Well actually this is categorized as mathematical hocus pocus because this breaks math. In order to use the basic properties of arithmetic (i.e. associative property, commutative property, etc.) the series has to converge. For a series to converge the sum of the infinite series has to add up to a finite number. In this case, we are unsure what the series converges to because it can add up to 0, 1, or 1/2--which is it? If you want to see a visual proof on YouTube check out this video.

Euler, a mathematical gangster, disobeyed the rules of mathematics and found even more surprising values for infinite sums. He concluded that 1+2+3+4+5+... = -1/12. Although this sounds nonsensical, this does apply to quantum physics. Physicists go by the rule that says nothing in the universe has an infinite measure, and these insane values surprisingly appear in their experiments. Although I don't know the details or the direct application to the field, I find it amazing that there is physical proof of nonsense existing. 

Physics generally follows this order: develop an equation and experiment with it (or vice verse). Excitingly, physicists found that math is wrong--in the quantum world--and experiments are correct. Usually, math is correct and the experiments are wrong. This is mind boggling because which one should we believe? 

In our lives, we know what's nonsense and what's correct. However, our field of view is limited from our frame of reference. A human experiences the universe on a human level. If we break out of this perspective and look from a planet's perspective our view changes dramatically. We'll see--as a planet--empty space and feel like we're floating amid nothingness. We'll see our counterparts: stars, asteroids, galaxies, planets, etc. Or instead of a planet's perspective, we look through a quantum perspective. We'll see particles whizzing by, we'll feel the electrical force, and we'll possibly see other dimensions (as theorized from String Theory). What if we take this a step further? What if there is a world smaller than the quantum world or a realm larger than the universe? Is this where all the mathematical hocus pocus is spawned? 

I'm an advocate for being open-minded. I like to accumulate many theories, ideas, and suggestions and determine which is correct and wrong (based on my opinion). This is not only limited to math and science, but also to real life situations. Teachers may provide life lessons in their classrooms and so do parents in their homes. People completely ignore the teacher and follow their parents advice because it's ethically correct--some may think. I believe that one should not completely ignore suggestions due to bias or alleged nonsense; instead one should take in both and generate a more appropriate conclusion. The same goes for math and science. Who knows? Maybe there are parallel universes, time travelers, different dimensions, green aliens, flying pigs, etc.